Civic Engagement

Policy

Here you can track the Governor's various plans through the legislative process and you can plug in to advocate on behalf of a proposal or policy. (COMING SOON)

MyIssue

Have an issue you want to discuss or organize? Want to see what other people in the state are talking about? Check out Myissue.

Working Groups

The Governor has formed various grassroots groups to help advocate for his agenda on the ground and in your community. Interested in helping? Click a working group on the right and get plugged in.

The views expressed by users of MyIssue.DevalPatrick.com do not necessarily represent the views of Deval Patrick, the Deval Patrick Committee or anyone else other than the person responsible for posting them.

Repeal or reform Ch. 209A (abuse protection orders)

Don't support this issue?


Coordinator: M.C. of Leominster

Ch. 209A (Abuse Prevention) is the state’s “restraining order” law.

The law, as written, allows a woman to have her husband (or boyfriend or otherwise father of their children) thrown out of their (or his own!) home, obtain full custody of their children, and provide that he not be allowed to contact her--or his own children!--directly or by third party, under penalty of 2.5 years in jail and a fine of $5,000.

Remarkable!

Consider: This is not done after a hearing in front of a jury. It is done “ex parte” -- without even the man’s knowledge that the restraining order has been sought. There is even a person in the courthouse dedicated to the sole purpose of helping women obtain such emergency restraining orders (so called “victim witnesses).

All she needs to do -- by the language of the law -- is “claim” to be in fear of the man. She does not need to present any evidence that she has been assaulted. She does not need to even manufacture a lie that she has been assaulted, because the law merely requires that she be”in fear.” Fear is a subjective state of mind that cannot be disproved!

Ch. 209A is a POLICE-STATE law. It belongs in a tyrannical society such as the former Soviet Union, or Nazi Germany.

The law needs to be immediately repealed. If the commonwealth believe that a law should be written that prescribes punishment for something that *might* happen, they do not understand the meaning of “freedom,” and I suggest would be right at home in Nazi Germany or a Muslim theocracy.

Note: Assault and battery is already a crime. If some new criminal law needs to be enacted to reflect the needs of family members from inter-family violence, it should be criminal in nature -- not quasi civil/criminal like 209A. Under such a ‘criminal’ statute, accused “batterers” would be presumed innocent until proven guilty, be accorded due process protections like other accused criminals, and women who “cry abuse” could be legally punished when they attempt to falsely criminalize an innocent man to gain possession of his children, his property, income and wealth.

People who have voted for this issue

Page: 1
8/2/09 J.P., Shutesbury

How many men are having thier lives damaged by the abuse of ... [more]

7/25/09 J.A., Taunton

there are far to many vindictive women abusing the 209a.. i ... [more]

6/8/09 J.F., Harwich

On May 28, 2009 my ex took a 209A R.O. order against me in ... [more]

3/10/09 R.B., Arlington

Like all criminal sanctions - those accused need the ... [more]

10/13/08 T.M., Boston

I was dating a woman for 5 years and when things started to go ... [more]

9/9/08 D.G., Framingham

The whole 209A Law needs to be rewritten, as you punish people ... [more]

7/26/08 R.B., Haverhill

Law should be repealed immediately. This is the United States. ... [more]

7/24/08 G.L., Acton

My advice to men is to use the current system if relationship ... [more]

7/2/08 E.H., Sherborn

This so called 209 A abuse protection act has been abused on a ... [more]

6/30/08 A.M., Douglas

209 SHOULD BE REPEALED TO MAKE THE LAWS WHO VIOLATE ... [more]

6/23/08 T.B., Springfield

 

6/13/08 D.C., Barre

I confronted my wife with evidence of her cheating on me . She ... [more]

5/2/08 J.C., Framingham

Again I am victimized under 209a!I stood in court and watched ... [more]

4/9/08 G.T., Boston

209a definitely needs reform... there are wo/men out there who ... [more]

4/2/08 L.I., Sandwich

I have just become a victim of the ease with which anyone can ... [more]

3/30/08 D.A., Malden

My son has been held for over 120 days on a 90 day 58a ... [more]

3/18/08 J.N., Lanesborough

 

3/11/08 R.M., Somerville

I agree - the 209(a) is being used by corrupt lawyers and ... [more]

2/14/08 S.R., Charlemont

my estrainged wife pulled a 209a on me through lies and deciet ... [more]

12/27/07 C.B., Dudley

Judge King in Worcester Probate Court as far as i'm concerned ... [more]

12/25/07 B.H., Norwood

My ex-wife did file for an unnecessary 209A order and she was ... [more]

11/24/07 A.T., Stow

I never really had an issue with the 209A until I was hit with ... [more]

11/21/07 M.H., Brookline

If at first you don't succeed, try, try again... My ex g/f ... [more]

11/15/07 M.B., Webster

 

10/10/07 J.S., Arlington

restraing order reform is a must! as a victim of falseley ... [more]

9/14/07 S.W., Plymouth

 

9/5/07 Y.C., Winchester

Another useless law against decent people. This thing can not ... [more]

9/4/07 J.D., Framingham

Being a Father who has in the past had multiple renewed ... [more]

8/26/07 G.M., West Springfield

I have a 209a against me and all I did was leave for a ... [more]

8/25/07 K.S., Franklin

this defenitly needs fixing. my son just had one issued ... [more]

7/31/07 M.L., West Springfield

I have a 209A order against me by my 26 yr old daughter ..... ... [more]

7/19/07 C.P., Fall River

I have had so many people over the years tell me about their ... [more]

7/13/07 S.L., Franklin

Allowing women to lie to get a 209A so as to have the upper ... [more]

7/8/07 N.P., Lowell

I have been falsely accused and served with this 209a twice ... [more]

7/5/07 R.L., Springfield

 

6/26/07 A.M., Fall River

This law is a horrible injustice, a tool used by the 209a ... [more]

5/15/07 J.B., Lincoln

I have official Court records, salvaged before it "lost" them, ... [more]

5/9/07 D.D., Belmont

I have not seen my children in 8 years DSS investigates and ... [more]

5/5/07 M.H., Lowell

Please email me at Hallbergjustice@yahoo.com It is the only ... [more]

5/2/07 D.C., Natick

 

5/2/07 P.M., Stow

 

4/29/07 W.A., Melrose

This is an absolutely frightening law due to the fact it can ... [more]

4/25/07 S.G., Methuen

I am an Emergency Room physician currently working with a ... [more]

4/24/07 A.F., Topsfield

I thought we banned guilt by accusation along with the witch ... [more]

4/20/07 B.M., Taunton

209A are MONEY MAKERS for Lawyers and this Corrupt Court ... [more]

4/18/07 L.W., Monroe

The orders MUST BE fair. Anyone can go to a judge, totally ... [more]

4/13/07 J.H., Taunton

the 209a has been used in order to allow my ex to gain custody ... [more]

4/11/07 R.D., Salem

My ex-wife used the 209A system to get me removed from MY ... [more]

4/9/07 M.E., Belmont

A restraining order is 1st issued for 10 days. Notice is sent ... [more]

4/8/07 T.B., Hopkinton

The 209A is itself an abuse of one's rights. How ironic! ... [more]

Expanded comments

Comment: 8/2/09 by J.P., Shutesbury

How many men are having thier lives damaged by the abuse of this law? Are all men assumed to be guilty just because an affidavit has been been filled out?

My son just got out of a very stormy relationship. three weeks after he moved out she filed a complaint. We hired an attorney who simply said my son might be leaving the state. The judge than granted the 209a for a full year. He just graduated from college and this will most assuredly hamper his career possibilties.

How do we fight back? It seems that there are many, many individuals in this condition. People can't just sit by and have their families lives taken away by angry /unstable people. Where do we start?

Comment: 7/25/09 by J.A., Taunton

there are far to many vindictive women abusing the 209a.. i have had just been served with my 6th 209a from the mother of my child.. here is the ignorance of justice ' I PROVED RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE JUDGE HIMSELF THAT MY EX LIED ABOUT EVERYTHING IN HER AFFIDAVIT.. I PROVED THIS BY PUTTING HER FATHER ON THE STAND.. HE TOLD THE JUDGE WHAT IS WRITTEN ON THIS PAPER IS FALSE.. NOTHING WRITTEN ON THIS PAPER HAPPEND THE WAY IT IS DESCRIBE HERE. WITH THAT SOLID TESTIMONY FROM HER OWN FATHER I STILL LOST THE CASE AND, SHE GOT HER 209A .. SHE WAS SO PROUD OF HERSELF AS SHE WALKED OUT OF THE COURT ROOM.. I HAVE THE TRANSCRIPT FROM THE DAY I PROVED HER LIES ITS ON A CD. I WISH I FOUND A LAWYER THAT WOULD LISTEN TO THIS CD AND SHOW CAUSE THAT EVEN WITH PROOF OF PERJURY TO OBTAIN A 209 IS A BIG PROBLEM.. SO MANY DADS LIKE MYSELF ARE BEING PUNISHED WITH THESE ORDERS KEEPIN US FROM OUR CHILDREN.. CHILDREN NEED THEIR DADS.. SAD PART IS THIS, ITS THE SYSTEM THAT IS KEEPING GOOD DADS FROM ...

Comment: 6/8/09 by J.F., Harwich

On May 28, 2009 my ex took a 209A R.O. order against me in Bristol P&F Court, J. Fernandes presiding. It was the third R.O. and second time she has used conversation with our son as her excuse. He is 21 and, unbeknownst to my ex until after the R.O. was issued, came in to support me that day. My son asked J. Fernandes if he could address the 209A issue and told him it was "boloney". Fernandes refused to address it, instead stating "I want to give your father a chance to calm his anger". Naturally, I objected to his biased and prejudiced statement.

On June 5 we returned for the hearing. My son came in to testify. Fernandes asked if she would like the R.O. extended. She said "No". I requested a hearing on the matter and he refused to hear it. Instead he let the R.O. expire leaving a "black mark" on my criminal record. He deliberately let her off the hook promoting her lying and continued perjury in court.

Our judges need to be held accountable for their injustices and repremanded ...

Comment: 3/10/09 by R.B., Arlington

Like all criminal sanctions - those accused need the protection of due process. We give thieves, robbers and murderers due process because it protects innocent citizens from wrongful prosecution. Domestic violence is wrong - but so are the false claims of domestic violence which have become tools in divorce an other family court actions.

Comment: 10/13/08 by T.M., Boston

I was dating a woman for 5 years and when things started to go sour and I told her I was leaving her she spat out, "If you leave me I will ruin your life!" Well I left and the next day I was suprised to see 2 Boston cops at my door with a 209A. I lost my job because of it. This law needs to change and it needs to change soon!

Comment: 9/9/08 by D.G., Framingham

The whole 209A Law needs to be rewritten, as you punish people who haven't even commited a crime in most cases and it shouldn't be so easy to get one. Just saying you are afraid is not enough and there should be atleast one instance of Assault and Battery or evidence of threats of violence not just the word of a person.

Comment: 7/26/08 by R.B., Haverhill

Law should be repealed immediately. This is the United States. I think maybe it's intent was good but like everything else, it became a tool of abuse for women against men and is abused 99% of the time. Due process is non existent in this law which is against the US Constitution. It belongs in a police state or tyranical society, but not here.

Comment: 7/24/08 by G.L., Acton

My advice to men is to use the current system if relationship issues cannot be worked out. 209As work both ways. If your partner has threatened you or at all been physical with you, go get a restraining order against them. Your almost sure to get one since there is little to no due process in these cases. It's a lifelong consequence once you have one on your criminal offender record. It will preclude you (or make very difficult) from getting jobs in healthcare, government, education etc.

In divorce cases women are often told to use a restraining order to help ensure custody, especially in cases where custody could go either way. It's sad because in the end the children lose most. They lose emotionally and many times financially.

Comment: 7/2/08 by E.H., Sherborn

This so called 209 A abuse protection act has been abused on a massive level by women that have never been abused but are the actual abusers themselves. Taking innocent men and fathers and falsly accusing them on their word alone is insanity! Their homes,children,property rwputations, peace of mind and pride all taking from them with no proof whatsoever! DISGUSTING! Ruining the main purpose of giving women who have actually been abused protection. MEN should have equal protection from insane abusive women and there are thousands of them out there usinbg thus act for personal gain!

Comment: 6/30/08 by A.M., Douglas

209 SHOULD BE REPEALED TO MAKE THE LAWS WHO VIOLATE RESTRAINING ORDERS MORE SEVERE. THE LADT FROM DANWICH IS NOT THE VITIM OF ANYTHING OR SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN THE ONE IN COURT IN FRONT OF THE JUDGE OBTAINING THE ORDER OF RESTRAINT. SHE IS VERY DEFENSIVE. LOOK AT HER WEBSITE LOSING FACE, WHERE SHE CLAIMS DOCTOR BOTCHED HER FACELIFT, THAT IS HER ISSUE NOT A RESTRAINING ORDER, SHE IS PLAYING "THE DISABLED VICTIM" BUT IT DIDN'T WORK IN COUT AND IT WON'T WORK AT THE HEARING. YOU SEE, AFTER I GOT THE ORDER, SHE CALLED ME AT MY PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT. NOT GOOD FOR LUCILLE., AND IF SHE GETS FRIEND TO VIOLATE THE ORDER, SHE WILL BE THE CAUSE FOR THEM GETTING SERVED ONE BECAUSE THATS CALLED "VIOLATION BY PROXY"! GEE, THEREARE SO MANY WAYS THE CRIMINAL CAN VIOLATE THE ORDER AND NOT EVEN KNOW IT UNTIL THEY ARE SERVED AGAIN WITH SOMETHING A LITTLE DIFFERENT!

Comment: 6/13/08 by D.C., Barre

I confronted my wife with evidence of her cheating on me . She attacked me threatening to kill me or have me committed if I didnt give evidence back(cell Texts)I locked myself in room and she used a 2 foot long candle stick holder and started smashing through the door. I called 911 no one was arrested she admitted to smashing door I was made to give cell phone back even though it was in my name!I ended up with 209a. next day in court I was not allowed to speak and she ended up with a 90 day order. There is no order against my children but have not been able to see the in nearly a month and I was there primary care giver. I cant afford a lawyer but she can.now she has me tied upin probate and has me labeled as an unfit father!!! NOT FAIR!!!!!!!

Comment: 5/2/08 by J.C., Framingham

Again I am victimized under 209a!I stood in court and watched my former roomate(female} lie under oath and get away with it! Not only did she get a continuance of the original order but had it increased to a 'no contact' order!I had no contact with this woman for over three mnths. I moved out and had the lease broken with the ok in writing from the landlord.The fact was she already had it changed with out me even being notified 20 DAYS earlier!!!!Where are my rights??Is the some agency to help men in these cases? Please help..and STOP THIS ILLEGAL LAW!!!!

Comment: 4/9/08 by G.T., Boston

209a definitely needs reform... there are wo/men out there who have been abused- but there are many more out there abusing the 209a orders-- repeatedly. there are also people out there who have gotten RO's against someone, thru false allegations-- and then proceeded to get away with assaulting the same person they previously claimed to be afraid of.

Comment: 4/2/08 by L.I., Sandwich

I have just become a victim of the ease with which anyone can obtain an Abuse Protection Order in MA. I am a 58 yr old disabled woman living alone. I have not seen my sister for 7 years, yet she was able to obtain an emergency Abuse Protection Order against me when it is physically impossible for any abuse to have occurred in the past present or future. I cannot drive more than a few miles from home and live on Cape Cod. My sister, Arlene Mulley lives in Douglas. I received the Order at 1:00 pm and the hearing was scheduled in Uxbridge District Court for 9:00 am the next day. My sister is well aware that it would be impossible for me to get transportation on such short notice. The police saw the dubiousness of this order and recommended I call the Court to see what could be done about rescheduling the hearing. The Clerk said I could write a letter to the judge explaining my situation, which I did. The ironic thing about this entire situation is that **I** have been the ...

Comment: 3/30/08 by D.A., Malden

My son has been held for over 120 days on a 90 day 58a hearing(a sick joke and a complete violation of due process). I am trying to find an organization or any help I can get.Dale Averill 781-321-7458,c-781-854-2293, averill02148@yahoo.com

Comment: 3/11/08 by R.M., Somerville

I agree - the 209(a) is being used by corrupt lawyers and frightenined judges to punish fathers (mostly) for no reason at all. It happened to me. I loved my wife and wanted my kids and she didn't wanted me to find out out about her secret boyfriend so her lawyer got me out of the house on a false 209(b). There are NO PENALTIES for a lawyer who misuses this system. I believe that women should be protected from domestic violence but right now the system is mostly being used by cynical lawyers who know that no evidence will ever required or penalties imposed. Bearing false witness is one of the things banned by the ten commandments, but it happens all the time in the Mass courts. It is one of the most painful things that ever happened to me. I loved my wife and children and never did or said anything to justify this, but a judge ordered me out and I was in danger of losing everything -- job, car, house, kids -- because she didn't want me to find out about the boy friend (it took ...

Comment: 2/14/08 by S.R., Charlemont

my estrainged wife pulled a 209a on me through lies and deciet with absolutely no solid proof. as a result of this DSS has branded me neglectful with absolutely no grounds other than her lies. I have court documents, wittness afidavids,as well as police reports that clearly prove that she is an alcoholic, drug addict, and physical abuser. DSS did not even investigate my side. I have never in my life been treated with such open faced bias and unproffesionalism. This entire system desperately needs to overhauled and this " the woman is always right" mantra needs to be done away with. I have not had the joy of seeing my children in months, and I'm the one staying up at night praying I don't get The phone call that she crashed her car and hurt my babies because of her addictions. the sick thing about it all is that she is a teacher in Greenfield, Ma. How could this school system not do any thing about an educater who is always hungover or still either drunk or high in the morning?

Comment: 12/27/07 by C.B., Dudley

Judge King in Worcester Probate Court as far as i'm concerned the biggest family destroyer in Worcester,was kind enough in giving her a restraining order against me, when she attacked me i called the police and the police report addresses her as the aggressor, he decided to take my son away all together from me so i left the court room, when i recived the paperwork in the mail my child support went up i lost legal custody of my son and if i want to see him i need to pay a supervised visitation fee. love this state

p.s. I have another son who i see quite often with no supervision or any other issues

Comment: 12/25/07 by B.H., Norwood

My ex-wife did file for an unnecessary 209A order and she was present for the first hearing in which all she could say to the judge was to cancel it. I even had a attorney to fight the order but even when it was vacated per request of the plaintiff, the attorney did nothing to have the court do anything about my ex-wife filing a false affidavit nor did he have the court specify return of my FID card even know it was expired but court did order for me to turn any ID cards in when the order was originally issued. I did get my FID card back from the police department but they were not truly unbiased which is wrong on their part, they are not the court themselves. My issue with the 209A system is that DSS got an electronic summary of this 209A and they never bothered to get the whole affidavit from the court and all this summary had was a file date and then a end date which was the ten-day period to have the hearing. The electronic summary DSS got never indicated “vacated per request of ...

Comment: 11/24/07 by A.T., Stow

I never really had an issue with the 209A until I was hit with one. I got it from a girl I ws friends with and never dated. I had asked her out at one point but she said she just wanted to be friends. As it turned out she was just using me to get some stuff done and once every thing was done she stopped talking to me. I was concerned simply because we would talk every day and then one day I did not hear any thing from her and so I tried to contact her several times and got no answer. I gave up and then I get a call from my local police dept to come down and see them. I was served with a 209A. I never made any forms of abuse towards that girl even though she claimed I had followed her when I was at work. I never even raised my voice with her in the 5 months we had been friends for. I am completely against abuse on women so yes a law does need to be in effect for that but it needs to have a little more proof needed other then just a women saying I feel threatened. I am possibly one ...

Comment: 11/21/07 by M.H., Brookline

If at first you don't succeed, try, try again...

My ex g/f attempted to get a RO, but was denied because she couldn't truthfully say to the judge that she was in fear of her life. Not happy with that, she hired an attorney from a well known Boston law firm to represent her in the second RO request. This time around she knew exactly all the right things to say to the judge, no doubt thanks to the coaching she received from her attorney. The second RO was granted despite the fact that less than 45 days had passed since the first attempted RO and it was the same judge who previously denied her RO request.

Sadly, judges will grant RO's even if case law or statute does not justify it. They would rather make a bad decision (legally speaking) than risk the possibility that the defendant happens to be that 1 out of a million who ends up killing the plaintiff. Even though judges don't like to have their decisions reversed on appeal, they know very well that the cost of an appeal ...

Comment: 10/10/07 by J.S., Arlington

restraing order reform is a must! as a victim of falseley obtained redtraining orders I feel helpless and violated by the court system in this state. My x has filed for and recieved at least 7 restraing orders against me. I have never been arrested for abuse against her. She files for these restraining orders only to limit me in seeing my son when she gets angry at me. On several occasions she has gotten a restraing order only to go back to the court house within days to have it removed. Cant these judges see whats going on? Its like she files for a restraining order and the judge says "take two...mabey you will need another one later or give one to your friend she may need one" please...can the court rape me anymore?

Comment: 9/5/07 by Y.C., Winchester

Another useless law against decent people. This thing can not deter the real criminal at all.

Comment: 9/4/07 by J.D., Framingham

Being a Father who has in the past had multiple renewed restraining orders held against me(all by the same woman)under false statements.I find it appauling how the system in this State is so unfair as stated by all the parties responding to this issue.This ridiculous court system in Massachusetts only continues to make responsible,law abiding,child support paying fathers just a paycheck for the custodial parent all while removing a father from his home and children.I really sympathize with any MAN having to deal with this absurd law and system.Wake up Massachusetts the children are the ones losing out!!!

Comment: 8/26/07 by G.M., West Springfield

I have a 209a against me and all I did was leave for a divorce. I have not seen my son since September 13th 2006. I missed his 10th birthday and all the holidays as well as his life this past year.

Comment: 8/25/07 by K.S., Franklin

this defenitly needs fixing. my son just had one issued because of what the women wrote. none of it true, however, the judge in probate court wouldn't even listen to us. restraing orders are very unfair to men.

Comment: 7/31/07 by M.L., West Springfield

I have a 209A order against me by my 26 yr old daughter ..... funny though.... she beat me up and went crying to the Clinton police. I was taken out of MY apartment with my name on the lease and all utilities and my 7 yr old son was taken by DSS because of all my daughter's lies. He was kidnapped by Worcester County DSS on March 19th. On april 17th (my birthday) my daughter stole my yahoo id and changed the password. funny when she came to court to renew the order she provided the judge with an instant message i supposidly sent her at 10:12 am on April 17th. My ID / password was changed about 10 am on april 17th. The judge extended the restraining order until December 28, 2007. Something has to be done about how easy it is to get a restraining order in Massachusetts. I know what it is like to NEED one. I was abused by my husband from 1996-2004 when I finally left.

Comment: 7/19/07 by C.P., Fall River

I have had so many people over the years tell me about their partners and how they went out and got a restraining order on them for nothing more than a spat. I think it's ridiculous that people are allowed to do that. I have had a "209A" ordered for me to stay away from a former boyfriend. I wrote him a letter, but there were no threatening remarks in it. I felt like a criminal in the courtroom! He also lied and said that I had harrassed him at his job, too. I think that it has been used as a weapon against people for too long. I understand that the courts don't want to take the chance that there really is abuse going on, but why don't they ever give the accused a chance to speak.....All I said in court is that I was sorry and meant no harm. The judge still granted it that day. Absolutely ridiculous!!!!!!

Comment: 7/13/07 by S.L., Franklin

Allowing women to lie to get a 209A so as to have the upper hand in divoce,has been going on for years, seemingly because of the previous governors and lieutenant governors who all allowed this, and looked the other way when someone would try to report the craziness of this. Unfortunately I have known too many males that this has happened to, and with the new governor who seems to be concerned with justice, I hope something will be done. It took TEN years for one male I know to prove to the courts that he was not the violent one, and that his wife was. When the court finally realized the truth, was anything done to the mother? Of course not. And all the father got was a simple apology from the judge. When women write these affidavits, they are under oath, and if they were held accountable for their actions, this 209A fraud would not be going on!

Comment: 7/8/07 by N.P., Lowell

I have been falsely accused and served with this 209a twice just before trial for custody of my daughter.We are currently in court once again less than 3 months after our out of court settlement and once again I have been falsely accused in order to get the 209a in which was not granted this time because of the flagrancy of the charges and eye witnesses that deny the claim.Even the probate court can not grant the 209a this time.Do you think that this woman will be charged with contempt,perjury.I think not!!! What a discrasful and corrupt society will live in that our own judiciary kidnaps our children

Comment: 6/26/07 by A.M., Fall River

This law is a horrible injustice, a tool used by the 209a industry to perpetuate a myth. Yes, domestic abuse is a tragedy, and yes, anyone being abused needs a quick formm of relief. But after the temporary solution, a due process of law needs to take place.

Comment: 5/15/07 by J.B., Lincoln

I have official Court records, salvaged before it "lost" them, that prove the Court deliberately issues frivolous life-ruining 209As "to get rid of [the Court's victim - usually a whistleblower on Court corruption]" "to get hold of those assets." This deliberately subverts fundamental law, is an act of treason, triggers felony-false police reports, and vitiates the intent of the restraining order law. I have triplicated and distributed this record for security purposes. In it the Judge calls it "fucking" her victims (both the alleged Complainant and the Defendant.)

Governor, this is an emergency that cannot await politics. Your failure after 5 months in office to act in any way to stop this is liable under criminal and civil actions for criminal neglect deliberately accessory to violations of Federal and State law, perpetrated with impunity by your own office's involvement in this and related Court corruption, treason, action outside jurisdiction, felony-false "police reports," ...

Comment: 5/9/07 by D.D., Belmont

I have not seen my children in 8 years DSS investigates and determains there was no abuse but my ex-wife fears for her life. What she fears is being found out to be a lier.

restraining orders do have a place but they need to be backed up by facts not myths

Comment: 5/5/07 by M.H., Lowell

Please email me at Hallbergjustice@yahoo.com It is the only way I can think of likeminded people being able to network to advocate these issues since there seems to be no way of networking with people who voted on this issue. Wasn't that the intent of this site. i.e. bring the issues to him and to provide a forum in which to organize? Please contact me and reference 209 A in the subject so we can continue to advance this cause.

Comment: 4/29/07 by W.A., Melrose

This is an absolutely frightening law due to the fact it can effortlessly be abused and ruin the reputation of a law abiding citizen. It also puts the person being falsely accused in unnecessary danger of arrest if they happen to run into the accuser. I have been a victim of a false 209a in which the accuser was not even my girlfriend but a friend who I broke all ties with. According to MGL 209a, the criteria for obtaining a 209a is that there must have been a "substantive" dating relationship and there was none. She even said on her affidavit that we "dated briefly in June". Briefly does not mean substantive but yet the temporary order issued anyway which enters my name into the states domestic abuse registry system permanently without the courts hearing one word from me and with the accuser not showing up at the 10 day hearing. The purpose of this person getting the order was out of revenge because her feelings were hurt when I said I wanted no more contact with her. The ...

Comment: 4/25/07 by S.G., Methuen

I am an Emergency Room physician currently working with a former assistant DA. He works in my ER as a tech. He resigned his position as assistant DA in Massachussets and took a job as an Emergency Room tech. He quit the legal profession altogether over his disgust at the abuse and corruption in the system as a whole. Abuse of 209A was one specific example that was described to me.

Comment: 4/24/07 by A.F., Topsfield

I thought we banned guilt by accusation along with the witch trials!

Comment: 4/20/07 by B.M., Taunton

209A are MONEY MAKERS for Lawyers and this Corrupt Court System. Ironic Who makes Our Laws. hmm……. LAWYERS?!

“ UNCONSTITUTIONAL ” for “ CORRUPTION ”

Comment: 4/18/07 by L.W., Monroe

The orders MUST BE fair. Anyone can go to a judge, totally make up a story and then you get served with a Restraining order, Then you cannot see nor speak to your child and you lose all of your rights. In my case my ex tells stories to the court to have me served. Then lies to the police saying I broke the restraining order and try to have me arrested. When I have done nothing, sometimes many miles away in a different state, then you are put in jail all by getting "set up" by your ex. My ex in Taunton MA plays this card always among others and makes it so I can never see my child and the Taunton Police believe everything Christy Wilcox says. Yet it is all lies. Now I have to go to multiple court cases and defend myself over LIES in order to at a minimum gain back my visitation rights. How is this working fairly? Of course it needs to be reformed, drastically.

Comment: 4/13/07 by J.H., Taunton

the 209a has been used in order to allow my ex to gain custody over my children and it is almost as if she had guidance to do so. It was dropped as soon as she obtained custody. Others who have a legitamate need for protection have not gotten any protection from this piece of paper. The only one whom it hurts are men who wish to see thier children.

Comment: 4/11/07 by R.D., Salem

My ex-wife used the 209A system to get me removed from MY house during our divorce. She never claimed I hit her, because I never have, but she claimed that she felt intimidated. Of course I was removed from the house and never was a full time father again.

In Massachusetts, if you are a father, your kids are not your own.

Comment: 4/9/07 by M.E., Belmont

A restraining order is 1st issued for 10 days. Notice is sent to the other party so that he/she may come to court and defend himself. If the man does not show up, the order is issued and it's good for 1 year. If the petitioner does not come in-- woman- the order is vacated. As always, always under the protection of our Constitution, EVERYONE has his or her day in court. Our justices are not weather vanes....

Comment: 4/8/07 by T.B., Hopkinton

The 209A is itself an abuse of one's rights. How ironic!

Reform is needed urgently. Governor, please take notice and hear what the voices of the citizens are telling you. The stories of lives being shattered by false 209A's are not made up. It is time to take notice and give equal protection under the law to all people, regardless of their gender.

Unfortunately, the 209A has become nothing more than a tool used by divorce attorneys to ensure the woman the gets the kids and the house. They are even granted over the phone! It goes like this..

PD: Hello - Woman: I am afraid - PD: Afraid of what? - Woman:I don't know, but that is what my lawyer said to I must say - PD: we'll send someone right over - Woman: Thank you - PD: Knock knock - Man: Come in - PD: Sorry sir but you are going to have to leave your home and kids. We'll give you 10 minutes to get your belongings. - Man: Why? - PD: Well we can't arrest you since you did nothing wrong. But your wife ...

Page: 1
.